Thank you for your response re the etiology of the
Roswell "flying saucer" debris, which I
photographed in General Ramey's office on July 8, 1947. I
have seriously and diligently tried to locate ANY
evidence that the debris I photographed was anything
OTHER than the debris gathered up by Major Marcel on the
ranch near Roswell. I have been totally unable to unearth
ANY evidence whatsoever to support the "balloon
switch" theory.
I have had conversations at length with
the only two other individuals still living who saw and
actually touched the debris -- Dr. Jesse Marcel, Jr.,
Irving Newton. Jesse Jr. recalls that his dad told him
that at least some of the debris in General Ramey's
office was the "real stuff" and Irving Newton
says there is no doubt in his mind that the debris he saw
and examined in Ramey's office was the same that Marcel
brought from New Mexico. Newton also told me that Marcel
followed him around the general's office that afternoon
trying to get him to examine closely the symbols on some
of the "sticks" that Marcel believed were
"not of this world".
I also have discussed
this point carefully and at length with several of the
major Roswell writers, including Stan Friedman, Kevin
Randle, Bill Moore and Philip Klass. None of them have
advanced ANY real evidence that there was any
"switch" or "dummying" of the real
Roswell debris.
Marcel's role in the Roswell Event apparently was not
fully reported until he was interviewed by Stan Friedman
and Bill Moore about 30 years later. This is reported in
"The Roswell Incident," written by Bill Moore
and Charles Berlitz, and published in 1980. In that
account Marcel was asked:
"Do you think that what you saw was a weather
balloon?"
Marcel replied:
"It was not. I was pretty well acquainted with
most everything that was in the air at that time, both
ours and foreign. I was also acquainted with virtually
every type of weather-observation or radar tracking
device being used by either the civilians or the
military. It was definitely not a weather or tracking
device, nor was it any sort of plane or missile. What it
was we didn't know.
|
We just picked up the fragments. It
was something I had never seen before, or since, for that
matter. I didn't know what it was, but it certainly
wasn't anything built by us and it most certainly wasn't
any weather balloon." (page 72.) As far as I know
Marcel never changed that statement.
Later in the Moore-Berlitz book Marcel says:
"...that next afternoon we loaded everything into
a B-29 on orders from Colonel Blanchard and flew it all
to Fort Worth... Just after we got to Carswell, Fort
Worth, we were told to bring some of this stuff up to the
general's office -- that he wanted to take a look at it.
We did this and spread it out on the
floor on some brown paper." (I certainly can vouch
for that statement, William, since I helped to spread it
out on the general's carpet in trying to pose a decent
photo of the junk.)
Marcel continued: "What we
had was only a very small portion of the debris -- there
was a whole lot more. There was half a B-29-ful outside.
General Ramey allowed some members of the press in to
take a picture of this stuff. They took one picture of me
on the floor holding up some of the less interesting
metallic debris... the stuff in that one photo was pieces
of the actual stuff we had found. It was not a staged
photo." (pages 74-75.) (Actually, I took two
pictures of Marcel, which have been reproduced in
numerous books published since that time. No other
pictures have surfaced of him.)
The "balloon switch" story apparently
stemmed from an additional comment from Marcel:
"Later, they cleared out our wreckage and
substituted some of their own. Then they allowed more
photos.... I was not in these. I believe there were taken
with the general and one of his aides." (page 75.)
It is obvious that the intervening 30 years had dimmed
the memory of Marcel. A close observation of the photos I
took of him, General Ramey and Colonel Dubose all clearly
show the SAME debris displayed just as I had posed it.
There was NO switch of ANY of the material.
So, William, unless you or someone else has some real
EVIDENCE to the contrary -- not just speculation -- I am
afraid that the "balloon switch" fable must
remain just that.
James Bond Johnson, Ph.D.
|