Betty Hill with Junior (alien head on table) and Dr. Charles Lietzau at MUFON International Symposium, Rochester, New York 2002. Photo credit Bill Konkolesky
In 1961, Betty and Barney Hill
encountered a UFO while driving home from their honeymoon. After
experiencing several hours of lost time and months of
nightmares, the couple sought therapeutic help. Under hypnosis,
an amazing story of alien abduction unfolded. Betty saved the
dress she was wearing at the time of the abduction, which had
acquired an unexplainable large pink stain on the front bodice
of the dress. The origin of this stain is presently under
investigation in several laboratories. Here are the first
findings.
In 1961, Betty and Barney Hill
encountered a UFO while driving home from their honeymoon. After
experiencing several hours of lost time and months of
nightmares, the couple sought therapeutic help. Under hypnosis,
an amazing story of alien abduction unfolded. Betty saved the
dress she was wearing at the time of the abduction, which had
acquired an unexplainable large pink stain on the front bodice
of the dress. The origin of this stain is presently under
investigation in several laboratories. Here are the first
findings.
The fabric material studied in this report originated from a patterned,
purple colored dress, Betty Hill wore at the time of her “abduction
experience” in 1961. After this incident Betty hung the dress in a
closet at her home in Portsmouth, New where, until recently it remained
relatively undisturbed. The
main purpose of this study was to examine samples from a pink stain
area on the upper part of the dress and compare the subtle or
implicate energy properties with non-stain (control) fabric from the
same dress.
These
cellulose acetate dress samples were obtained through the interactive
efforts of M. Ruben, Ms. Kathy Marden and Mr. Bill Konkolesky.
Fabric sections approximately 3x4 cm in area, were submitted to this
laboratory by Bill Konkolesky on July 16, 2002.
An initial series of experiments were conducted to
determine the influence of the stained fabric on the internal
energy of water. The test procedure is based on a method developed
by Levengood and Gedye (1,2), for monitoring Charge Density Pulses
(CDP) originating within water and living organisms. Since living
systems are composed of around 95% water (both bound and free),
the rational for comparing the fabric samples for possible stain
induced changes in water, becomes obvious.
Dress
fragments with an aliquot weight of 44 mg were added to the 20 ml
of pure water in the CDP-petri dish system. Each test series was
initiated around 9:00A and repeat CDP traces were taken at 10 min.
intervals over a period of 5-6 hrs. These data were examined
statistically and from this it was determined that the fabric from
the stain area induced a higher degree of internal energy in the
water when compared with the aliquot from the non-stain fabric.
The question then arises as to whether this stain material could
have any influence during interaction with a living organism?
To
examine these possible interactive factors the water samples from
the CDP tests were used in a wheat seed – petri dish bioassay.
Standard germination procedures were used (20 seeds per test
placed on special, moist paper disks used in petri dish
germination). These dishes were placed inside a germination
chamber (25C) and measurements of the coleoptile (shoot)
development were recorded at time points during the germination
cycle.
Although
the general procedure is to take the first data at 3 days, it was
noticed that at 48 hrs. development, there appeared to be a growth
difference between the two populations of seedlings. Due to the
fact that an early growth difference is a very unusual situation,
measurements were taken of coleoptile lengths. These data are
summarized in the following table.
Bioassay
tests using water in which the Betty Hill, fabric samples (44 mg.)
had been soaked (data taken from wheat seeds after 48 hr. in
germination chamber).
This bioassay
test was continued out to the 7-day germination stage. At this
point the seedlings in the stain water dish, disclosed a 34%
increase relative to the controls, still statistically
significant. Because of this very unusual growth response in the
stain area sample it was decided to conduct a second bioassay.
This test procedure is defined as
Paper Roll Germination. The seeds are positioned in a row
along special germination paper, using 30 seed per roll. Also
included in this bioassay is a test roll designated as “control
#1” – plain water (100 ml in 8 oz. vial) with no dress sample.
The sample designated as “control #2” has 4-mg/100 ml, of
material from the non-stain region. The third sample group
designated “stain region” has 4-mg/100 ml, of dress material
from the pink stain area.
In
this type of test a “Development Factor” (Df) is applied in
the data analysis. With this factor one is able to take into
account both the fraction germinated and the mean seedling length,
for each test sample and at each development stage. This Df factor
is given by the simple relationship:
Df = (fraction germinated) x (average seedling length)
In
Fig.1 the development data (Df) are summarized over the 7-day
period of testing. There is no statistical difference between the
two control samples. This means that the dress material from the
non-stain region had no apparent influence on the development
characteristics of the bioassay seeds.
By contrast the seedlings
in the container with the material from the stain region developed
at a significantly (P<0.05) higher rate than either of the
control samples. It should also be noted in Fig.1 that the growth
rate (cm/day) of the seedlings in the dish with the stain sample
also continued to be at a higher level (greater slope constant)
throughout the test period. At seven days the stain region
seedlings disclosed a +30% increase relative to the controls, a
value which is approximately the same as obtained (+34%) in the
petri dish Bioassay #1.
In
general the data presented in this study clearly indicate that the
material on the dress, can in its present state alter metabolic
activity in living organisms. Although it increased the growth
rate in plant seedlings, what it might do when contacting other
living systems is not known, nor is there any assurance that it
has not changed properties during the 40 yr. storage.
It
is very difficult to alter the seedling development in plants. For
example adding plant food to the water media in which the plants
are exposed during germination will not increase development rate
and in fact can in some cases produce decreased germination.
Application of plant hormones such as gibberellins and auxins
produce characteristic changes in the seedling morphology, which
were not observed in this study. These factors are mentioned here
so that the reader can appreciate the unusual growth responses
obtained with this material.
During
a recent meeting with Phyllis Budinger, of Frontier Analysis, Ltd., a series of beautiful photomicrographs of the Betty Hill dress samples were presented, as well as numerous, infrared spectrographic tests. Her findings are extremely
interesting and it is anticipated that her comprehensive study
will be released in the near future.
W.C. Levengood and J.L. Gedye, Evidence for Charge
Density Pulses Associated with Bioelectric Fields in Living
Organisms, Subtle Energies & Energy Medicine, 8, pp
33-54 (1998).
W.C. Levengood and J.L. Gedye, Method and Apparatus for Detecting, Recording and Analyzing Spontaneously Generated Transient Electric Charge Pulses in Living
Organisms. U.S. Patent No. 6,347,238 B1, Feb. 12, 2002.
Copyright © 2003. All Rights Reserved. Dr. William C. Levengood of Pinelandia Biophysics Laboratory of Michigan.
Click here to see Wheat Seedling
Bioassay Using Betty Hill Dress
BACK
NEXT